Encyc

Encyc houses over 100 concepts relevant to the history of eugenics and its continued implications in contemporary life. These entries represent in-depth explorations of key concepts for understanding eugenics.

Aboriginal and Indigenous Peoples
Michael Billinger
Alcoholism and drug use
Paula Larsson
Archives and institutions
Mary Horodyski
Assimilation
Karen Stote
Bioethical appeals to eugenics
Tiffany Campbell
Bioethics
Gregor Wolbring
Birth control
Molly Ladd-Taylor
Childhood innocence
Joanne Faulkner
Colonialism
Karen Stote
Conservationism
Michael Kohlman
Criminality
Amy Samson
Degeneracy
Michael Billinger
Dehumanization: psychological aspects
David Livingstone Smith
Deinstitutionalization
Erika Dyck
Developmental disability
Dick Sobsey
Disability rights
Joshua St. Pierre
Disability, models of
Gregor Wolbring
Down Syndrome
Michael Berube
Education
Erna Kurbegovic
Education as redress
Jonathan Chernoguz
Educational testing
Michelle Hawks
Environmentalism
Douglas Wahlsten
Epilepsy
Frank W. Stahnisch
Ethnicity and race
Michael Billinger
Eugenic family studies
Robert A. Wilson
Eugenic traits
Robert A. Wilson
Eugenics
Robert A. Wilson
Eugenics as wrongful
Robert A. Wilson
Eugenics: positive vs negative
Robert A. Wilson
Family planning
Caroline Lyster
Farming and animal breeding
Sheila Rae Gibbons
Feeble-mindedness
Wendy Kline
Feminism
Esther Rosario
Fitter family contests
Molly Ladd-Taylor
Gender
Caroline Lyster
Genealogy
Leslie Baker
Genetic counseling
Gregor Wolbring
Genetics
James Tabery
Genocide
Karen Stote
Guidance clinics
Amy Samson
Hereditary disease
Sarah Malanowski
Heredity
Michael Billinger
Human enhancement
Gregor Wolbring
Human experimentation
Frank W. Stahnisch
Human nature
Chris Haufe
Huntington's disease
Alice Wexler
Immigration
Jacalyn Ambler
Indian--race-based definition
Karen Stote
Informed consent
Erika Dyck
Institutionalization
Erika Dyck
Intellectual disability
Licia Carlson
Intelligence and IQ testing
Aida Roige
KEY CONCEPTS
Robert A. Wilson
Kant on eugenics and human nature
Alan McLuckie
Marriage
Alexandra Minna Stern
Masturbation
Paula Larsson
Medicalization
Gregor Wolbring
Mental deficiency: idiot, imbecile, and moron
Wendy Kline
Miscegenation
Michael Billinger
Motherhood
Molly Ladd-Taylor
Natural and artificial selection
Douglas Wahlsten
Natural kinds
Matthew H. Slater
Nature vs nurture
James Tabery
Nazi euthanasia
Paul Weindling
Nazi sterilization
Paul Weindling
Newgenics
Caroline Lyster
Nordicism
Michael Kohlman
Normalcy and subnormalcy
Gregor Wolbring
Parenting and newgenics
Caroline Lyster
Parenting of children with disabilities
Dick Sobsey
Parenting with intellectual disabilities
David McConnell
Pauperism
Caroline Lyster
Person
Gregor Wolbring
Physician assisted suicide
Caroline Lyster
Political science and race
Dexter Fergie
Popular culture
Colette Leung
Population control
Alexandra Stern
Prenatal testing
Douglas Wahlsten
Project Prevention
Samantha Balzer
Propaganda
Colette Leung
Psychiatric classification
Steeves Demazeux
Psychiatry and mental health
Frank W. Stahnisch
Psychology
Robert A. Wilson
Public health
Lindsey Grubbs
Race and racialism
Michael Billinger
Race betterment
Erna Kurbegovic
Race suicide
Adam Hochman
Racial hygiene
Frank W. Stahnisch
Racial hygiene and Nazism
Frank Stahnisch
Racial segregation
Paula Larsson
Racism
Michael Billinger
Reproductive rights
Erika Dyck
Reproductive technologies
Caroline Lyster
Residential schools
Faun Rice
Roles of science in eugenics
Robert A. Wilson
Schools for the Deaf and Deaf Identity
Bartlomiej Lenart
Science and values
Matthew J. Barker
Selecting for disability
Clarissa Becerra
Sexual segregation
Leslie Baker
Sexuality
Alexandra Minna Stern
Social Darwinism
Erna Kurbegovic
Sociobiology
Robert A. Wilson
Sorts of people
Robert A. Wilson
Special education
Jason Ellis
Speech-language pathology
Joshua St. Pierre
Standpoint theory
Joshua St. Pierre
Sterilization
Wendy Kline
Sterilization compensation
Paul Weindling
Stolen generations
Joanne Faulkner
Subhumanization
Licia Carlson
Today and Tomorrow: To-day and To-morrow book series
Michael Kohlman
Training schools for the feeble-minded
Katrina Jirik
Trans
Aleta Gruenewald
Transhumanism and radical enhancement
Mark Walker
Tuberculosis
Maureen Lux
Twin Studies
Douglas Wahlsten & Frank W. Stahnisch
Ugly Laws
Susan M. Schweik and Robert A. Wilson
Unfit, the
Cameron A.J. Ellis
Violence and disability
Dick Sobsey
War
Frank W. Stahnisch
Women's suffrage
Sheila Rae Gibbons

Masturbation

Today medical professionals see masturbation as a normal sexual outlet, one that men and women practice as part of a healthy sexual lifestyle. During the late 1800s and early 1900s, it was viewed quite differently. Although science was beginning to move away from religious ideology at this time, many scientific thinkers were still informed by a Christian sense of morality. When this morality was mixed with the new science of eugenics, scientists and elite thinkers began to consider certain acts that they deemed as ‘immoral’ to be associated with mental degeneracy. Such was the case of masturbation. The eugenic focus on reproductive control led to a concern over the practice of non-reproductive sexual stimulation. Psychiatrists and biologists heavily debated the affects they believed resulted from excessive masturbation. It was largely believed that the practice of masturbation was both a cause and a symptom of insanity. The increased role of science within western psychiatry led doctors and psychiatrists to study the practice of masturbation and its so-called ‘evils’. These studies had a particularly gendered aspect and were usually directed at young men, while women who demonstrated an increased sexuality were instead classified as nymphomaniacs. Due to the pseudo-scientific nature of such studies, the beliefs about masturbation and mental health were highly varied.

Both a Cause and a Symptom
The case of masturbation is an interesting one because doctors were unsure of whether to classify it as a cause of insanity, or a symptom of insanity. Psychiatrists during the nineteenth century believed that some individuals were born with a certain amount of ‘vital force’ or ‘nerve power’, which could be depleted through certain activities that raised the excitement levels of the body. Masturbation was believed to be one of these activities. As such, doctors believed that individuals who were feeble-minded were at risk of sending themselves into a state of insanity if they used up their ‘nervous energy’ through frequent masturbation. For example, the Canadian physician Stephen Lett stated, “in early life, the child who thus pollutes himself retards and arrests the healthy development of his nervous system, and the practice in such a one tends to idiocy and imbecility.” Lett, and many like him, believed that continual non-reproductive stimulation could lead to further mental degeneration and the result was insanity. Insanity thus produced was referred to as ‘Masturbational Insanity’ or ‘Sexual Neurosis’ and was particularly diagnosed in younger men. The classification of Masturbational Insanity began early in the 19th century, with the writings of a group of doctors called the Alienists, while the idea of Sexual Neurosis was more popular in the late 19th century in the works of Benjamin Rush and Luther Bell.

Although masturbation was seen as a possible cause of insanity, doctors also believed that masturbation could be a symptom of insanity. It was believed that once human reason had left the mind, the ‘animal passions’ would be uncontrollable and many humans indulged in masturbation as a result. Doctors within insane asylums often noted that masturbation occurred frequently among patients of all ages. When present, it was seen as an obstruction to the treatment of the insane, as doctors believed that it harmed the mental health of a patient. As such, masturbation was often viewed as an illness of the mind at the initiation of the eugenics movement.

Masturbation and Science
The rise of psychiatric medicine and the increasing interest in the causes of insanity led scientists to investigate the biological aspects of sexuality and masturbation. One widely held belief in the 19th century was that masturbation hindered the ability to have ‘normal’ sexual encounters (between a man and a woman) and thereby hinder reproduction. This led many scientists to try and pinpoint which aspect of the brain was the center for sexual function, as they believed that the deterioration or disease of this part of the brain would be the reason behind cases of Masturbational Insanity. Many scientists performed experiments on animals for their research, removing different parts of the brain before seeing if the animal could mate. Not surprisingly, these experiments were unfruitful.

The Influences of Gender
Since doctors believed that the masturbation prevented proper reproduction, it was believed to be a great evil. This was especially the case when it came to men. It was believed that repeated masturbation could cause congestions and blockages of the urethra. While blockages of the urethra are possible from certain medical conditions, ejaculation would not have caused such congestions. Yet many North American and British doctors believed that cleaning of the deep urethra was an important practice when presented with a patient who was prone to masturbation. In some patients circumcision was also used as a treatment. Additional psychiatric treatment was usually recommended in these cases.

It is therefore easy to see that the medical discussion was focused on the issues surrounding males who masturbated—circumcision and urethral cleaning were not treatments to be given to female masturbators. This was largely informed by conceptions of gender at this time. It was seen as especially dangerous for men to masturbate regularly (although occasional masturbation was not so bad), because they risked being unable to have other sexual encounters. This was especially bad in a society that conceived of men as sexual aggressors, with a duty to reproduce in the ‘natural’ way. Those men who acted in a way seen as contrary to the natural order were deemed to be insane. This was especially the case for those men who failed to demonstrate masculinity, because of their ‘nervous’ demeanor.

In contrast, women who masturbated were usually classified as nymphomaniacs. Gender assumptions of the time believed women to be more susceptible to nervous conditions, which masturbation was thought to excite. Women were traditionally believed to be reserved, docile and the passive partners in sexual encounters. Masturbation implied an active sexual drive and was therefore considered an expression of an unsound mind in women. The term 'Nymphomania' was used to classify the insanity of women who demonstrated an active interest in sexuality. While doctors believed masturbation was a cause of insanity in men, it was almost exclusively seen as an indication of insanity in women.

Conclusion: From Sexuality to Insanity
Judeo-Christian morality has condemned the practice of masturbation throughout Western history. These moral values were the basis for the early medicalization of the practice. Physicians deemed this natural act ‘abnormal’ in the late 18th and 19th centuries. It was seen as a danger to the mental, physical and moral health of an individual. Masturbation was linked to various ideas about the nature of human passion and the expression of insanity. This expression was intimately linked to social concepts of gender. Victorian conceptions of masculinity viewed men as sexual aggressors and therefore saw ‘excessive’ masturbation as a danger to normal reproductive encounters. Women who practiced masturbation opposed the idea of a passive, submissive femininity. These women were thus classified as nymphomaniacs, as female masturbation was seen as a symptom of an unsound mind.

- Paula Larsson

  • Lett, S. (1887). The Relationship of Insanity to Masturbation. The Canada Lancet 19, 12, 360-363.

    Mackenzie, J.A. (1902). Mental Disturbances of Puberty and Adolescence. The Maritime Medical News 14, 12, 437-443.

    Barker, L. F. (1940). Psychotheraphy. New York and London: D. Appleton – Century Company Inc.

    Laquer, T. (2003). Solitary Sex: A Cultural History of Masturbation and Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud. New York: ZONE Books.

    Mason, D. E. (2008). The Secret Vice: Masturbation in Victorian Fiction and Medical Culture. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Patton, M. S. (1986). Twentieth Century Attitudes towards Masturbation. Journal of Religion and Health 25, 4, 291-302.