Encyc

Encyc houses over 100 concepts relevant to the history of eugenics and its continued implications in contemporary life. These entries represent in-depth explorations of key concepts for understanding eugenics.

Aboriginal and Indigenous Peoples
Michael Billinger
Alcoholism and drug use
Paula Larsson
Archives and institutions
Mary Horodyski
Assimilation
Karen Stote
Bioethical appeals to eugenics
Tiffany Campbell
Bioethics
Gregor Wolbring
Birth control
Molly Ladd-Taylor
Childhood innocence
Joanne Faulkner
Colonialism
Karen Stote
Conservationism
Michael Kohlman
Criminality
Amy Samson
Degeneracy
Michael Billinger
Dehumanization: psychological aspects
David Livingstone Smith
Deinstitutionalization
Erika Dyck
Developmental disability
Dick Sobsey
Disability rights
Joshua St. Pierre
Disability, models of
Gregor Wolbring
Down Syndrome
Michael Berube
Education
Erna Kurbegovic
Education as redress
Jonathan Chernoguz
Educational testing
Michelle Hawks
Environmentalism
Douglas Wahlsten
Epilepsy
Frank W. Stahnisch
Ethnicity and race
Michael Billinger
Eugenic family studies
Robert A. Wilson
Eugenic traits
Robert A. Wilson
Eugenics
Robert A. Wilson
Eugenics as wrongful
Robert A. Wilson
Eugenics: positive vs negative
Robert A. Wilson
Family planning
Caroline Lyster
Farming and animal breeding
Sheila Rae Gibbons
Feeble-mindedness
Wendy Kline
Feminism
Esther Rosario
Fitter family contests
Molly Ladd-Taylor
Gender
Caroline Lyster
Genealogy
Leslie Baker
Genetic counseling
Gregor Wolbring
Genetics
James Tabery
Genocide
Karen Stote
Guidance clinics
Amy Samson
Hereditary disease
Sarah Malanowski
Heredity
Michael Billinger
Human enhancement
Gregor Wolbring
Human experimentation
Frank W. Stahnisch
Human nature
Chris Haufe
Huntington's disease
Alice Wexler
Immigration
Jacalyn Ambler
Indian--race-based definition
Karen Stote
Informed consent
Erika Dyck
Institutionalization
Erika Dyck
Intellectual disability
Licia Carlson
Intelligence and IQ testing
Aida Roige
KEY CONCEPTS
Robert A. Wilson
Kant on eugenics and human nature
Alan McLuckie
Marriage
Alexandra Minna Stern
Masturbation
Paula Larsson
Medicalization
Gregor Wolbring
Mental deficiency: idiot, imbecile, and moron
Wendy Kline
Miscegenation
Michael Billinger
Motherhood
Molly Ladd-Taylor
Natural and artificial selection
Douglas Wahlsten
Natural kinds
Matthew H. Slater
Nature vs nurture
James Tabery
Nazi euthanasia
Paul Weindling
Nazi sterilization
Paul Weindling
Newgenics
Caroline Lyster
Nordicism
Michael Kohlman
Normalcy and subnormalcy
Gregor Wolbring
Parenting and newgenics
Caroline Lyster
Parenting of children with disabilities
Dick Sobsey
Parenting with intellectual disabilities
David McConnell
Pauperism
Caroline Lyster
Person
Gregor Wolbring
Physician assisted suicide
Caroline Lyster
Political science and race
Dexter Fergie
Popular culture
Colette Leung
Population control
Alexandra Stern
Prenatal testing
Douglas Wahlsten
Project Prevention
Samantha Balzer
Propaganda
Colette Leung
Psychiatric classification
Steeves Demazeux
Psychiatry and mental health
Frank W. Stahnisch
Psychology
Robert A. Wilson
Public health
Lindsey Grubbs
Race and racialism
Michael Billinger
Race betterment
Erna Kurbegovic
Race suicide
Adam Hochman
Racial hygiene
Frank W. Stahnisch
Racial hygiene and Nazism
Frank Stahnisch
Racial segregation
Paula Larsson
Racism
Michael Billinger
Reproductive rights
Erika Dyck
Reproductive technologies
Caroline Lyster
Residential schools
Faun Rice
Roles of science in eugenics
Robert A. Wilson
Schools for the Deaf and Deaf Identity
Bartlomiej Lenart
Science and values
Matthew J. Barker
Selecting for disability
Clarissa Becerra
Sexual segregation
Leslie Baker
Sexuality
Alexandra Minna Stern
Social Darwinism
Erna Kurbegovic
Sociobiology
Robert A. Wilson
Sorts of people
Robert A. Wilson
Special education
Jason Ellis
Speech-language pathology
Joshua St. Pierre
Standpoint theory
Joshua St. Pierre
Sterilization
Wendy Kline
Sterilization compensation
Paul Weindling
Stolen generations
Joanne Faulkner
Subhumanization
Licia Carlson
Today and Tomorrow: To-day and To-morrow book series
Michael Kohlman
Training schools for the feeble-minded
Katrina Jirik
Trans
Aleta Gruenewald
Transhumanism and radical enhancement
Mark Walker
Tuberculosis
Maureen Lux
Twin Studies
Douglas Wahlsten & Frank W. Stahnisch
Ugly Laws
Susan M. Schweik and Robert A. Wilson
Unfit, the
Cameron A.J. Ellis
Violence and disability
Dick Sobsey
War
Frank W. Stahnisch
Women's suffrage
Sheila Rae Gibbons

Degeneracy

Degeneracy is a theory that was popular in the late 19th century, based on the premise that certain (lower) social classes and races were predisposed to various neurological and mental illnesses due to bad heredity, resulting in social degradation. This theory can be distinguished from more popular scientific theories of biological heredity of the time, such as Mendelism and/or Natural Selection, in that it attributed general conditions such as mental instability and poor health to certain types of behaviours, such as having an “immoral lifestyle.” Implicit in this notion of hereditary moral pathology was that certain social groups such as prostitutes, criminals, the poor, and the insane, were morally defective and represented a regression in human evolution. It was widely believed that these moral and physical pathologies would persist and proliferate from generation to generation whether through biological or social means, therefore, miscegenation between such morally defective individuals, particularly of other (undesirable) races, should be highly regulated (i.e., eugenics and moral hygiene) for the good of society.

Degeneracy theory, heredity, and social environment
A theory of progressive degeneracy was first proposed by B.A. Morel in 1857 in his book, Traits des Dégénérescences Physiques, Intellectuelles et Morales de l’Espèce Humaine (trans. Treatise on Degeneracy). Morel claimed that the use of various ‘poisons’ such as hashish, alcohol, and opium resulted in progressive physical and moral deterioration (e.g., feeblemindedness), which would be passed on from generation to generation, ultimately resulting in an unfit society. This entailed a worsening in the overall intellectual or moral character or integrity, as well as physical characters, resulting in the proliferation of individuals of inferior quality or ability. This theory remained popular in medicine and psychiatry as well as anthropology, biology, sociology, and criminology well into the early 20th century. Morel’s theory was accepted by such influential psychiatrists and physicians as Henry Maudsley (1835-1918), Max Simon Nordau (1849-1923), and Cesare Lombroso (1835–1909).

Nordau (1898:6) defined degeneracy as “a morbid deviation from an original type. This deviation, even if, at the outset, it was ever so slight contained transmissible elements of such a nature that anyone bearing in him the germs becomes more and more incapable of fulfilling his functions in the world; and mental progress . . . finds itself menaced also in his descendants.”

Maudsley (1884) characterized degeneracy as the successive peeling-away of the fine textures of moral sentiments and detailed the following stages of the descent into degeneration: 1) insufficient exercise and improper use of moral and volitional powers so that the unchecked satisfaction of passion introduced a deterioration of character in the first generation; 2) a mental derangement would emerge in the second generation that was manifested in defects in character that fell short of madness or crime; 3) the third generation descended into moral imbecility with or without intellectual impairment; 4) the lineage would finally be extinguished through sterility or impotence. Maudsley’s classification of degenerate behaviours included masturbation, licentiousness or gross sexual debauchery, egocentricity and self-importance, nymphomania, vagabondage, degenerate personal hygiene, and persistent laziness.

Lombroso, who is best known for his study of the causes of criminality, considered criminals to be “throwbacks” to earlier phases of evolution (i.e., degenerates). As such, Lombroso believed that the physical features and physiological reactions of criminals would be different from those of the “normal nineteenth century man.” Although Lombroso’s work was more diagnostic in nature, focusing on the anatomical manifestations of degeneracy, he described a whole range of ancestral characteristics, both physical and ethical, including large and protruding zygomata, bulky jaw bones, small cranial capacity, prominent superciliary arches, large orbits, great visual acuity, darker skin, pot handle or voluminous ears as in the monkey, and insensitivity to pain; and, further, obscene tattoos, complete moral insensitivity, total lack of remorse, lack of foresight which sometimes seemed like courage, and courage which alternated with cowardice, excessive idleness, “love of orgies”, need to do evil for its own sake, to kill, and “not only that, but cruelty to the victim, to tear the flesh and drink the blood. ”

With the growing acceptance of evolutionary theory in the in late 19th century, similarly-minded theorists feared that successive generations of ‘debased living,’ including “race-mixing” or miscegenation, could effectively result in the reversal of evolutionary processes. Conceptually, the theory of degeneracy simultaneously attributed social degradation to both heredity and environment. While many believed that improving social environments would correct moral degeneracy, eugenicists, including Francis Galton, believed that the biological transmission of such traits should be legislatively (via marriage and immigration laws) and/or medically (via sterilization laws) controlled in order to prevent the proliferation of “inferior stock” and to preserve the higher classes and races from the effects of progressive degeneracy and criminality, and that desirable couples should be presented with incentives to have children.

-Michael Billinger

  • Carlson, E.A. (2001). The unfit: A history of a bad idea. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

  • Goodson, I, & Dowbiggin, I. (1990). Docile bodies: commonalities in the history of psychiatry and schooling. In S.J. Ball (Ed.), Foucault and Education: Disciplines and Knowledge (pp. 105-132). New York, NY: Routledge.

  • Lombardo, P. (2008). Three generations, no imbeciles: eugenics, the Supreme Court, and Buck v. Bell. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Maudsley, H. (1884). Body and will. New York: D. Appleton.

  • Mazzarello, P. (2011). Cesare Lombroso: an anthropologist between evolution and degeneration. Functional Neurology, 26(2), 97-101.

  • Morel, B.A. (1857). Traits des dégénérescences physiques, intellectuelles et morales de l’Espèce humaine. Paris: J.B. Baillière.

  • Nordau, M. (1898). Degeneration. London: William Heinemann.

  • Rimke, H., & Hunt, A. (2002). From sinners to degenerates: the medicalization of morality in the 19th Century. History of the Human Sciences, 15(1), 59-88.